Ok okay guys. I was wondering since 3m has taken over Megs. I was wondering if anybody has tried both products. The performance finish is interesting in that no haze time is required before removing.
- If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
3M performance finish vs. NXT 2.0
Collapse
X
-
Re: 3M performance finish vs. NXT 2.0
Originally posted by saturn2 View PostOk okay guys. I was wondering since 3m has taken over Megs. I was wondering if anybody has tried both products. The performance finish is interesting in that no haze time is required before removing.
As for your question I have never used the performance finish, so I can't really help you with that.
AndyKeeping MOL family friendly! If you need help or have a question, don't hesitate to shoot me an email or PM. 101impala@gmail.com
Andy M. Moderator
-
Re: 3M performance finish vs. NXT 2.0
I can only comment on 3M's compounds over the past 28 years I have gotten better results with 3M as far as
1. speed of cut
2. less swirls
3.better clarity after compounding wool and foam
4 very little dusting if any
1-4 based on 3M's Perfect It 6060 and newer version 6085 against Megs
# 85 Diamond cut, #105 Ultra cut side by side
Comment
-
Re: 3M performance finish vs. NXT 2.0
Interesting. I've read a LOT of people say the newest 3M compound was the biggest step BACKWARDS in the history of detailing. Outside of MOL, M105 appears to be the hands down clear winner for the fastest cutting, best finishing compound out there...people who previously didn't have a positive thing to say about Meg's (Can't imagine how?) are now swearing by M105.
I guess it all goes to show that there certainly are "different strokes, for different folks."
Comment
-
Re: 3M performance finish vs. NXT 2.0
Originally posted by SHYNEMAN123 View PostI can only comment on 3M's compounds over the past 28 years I have gotten better results with 3M as far as
1. speed of cut
2. less swirls
3.better clarity after compounding wool and foam
4 very little dusting if any
1-4 based on 3M's Perfect It 6060 and newer version 6085 against Megs
# 85 Diamond cut, #105 Ultra cut side by side
Comment
-
Re: 3M performance finish vs. NXT 2.0
Originally posted by saturn2 View Post
Okay guys. I was wondering since 3m has taken over Megs.
As already posted, 3M has not taken over Meguiar's
The announcement was made on Monday September 8th, and today is Thursday September 11th... it's been 3 days since the announcement....
Comment
-
Re: 3M performance finish vs. NXT 2.0
Originally posted by saturn2 View PostOk okay guys. I was wondering since 3m has taken over Megs. I was wondering if anybody has tried both products. The performance finish is interesting in that no haze time is required before removing.
Comment
-
Re: 3M performance finish vs. NXT 2.0
Originally posted by Mike Phillips View PostSorry but this is too funny...
As already posted, 3M has not taken over Meguiar's
The announcement was made on Monday September 8th, and today is Thursday September 11th... it's been 3 days since the announcement....
Comment
-
Re: 3M performance finish vs. NXT 2.0
Originally posted by Mike Phillips View PostSorry but this is too funny...
As already posted, 3M has not taken over Meguiar's
The announcement was made on Monday September 8th, and today is Thursday September 11th... it's been 3 days since the announcement....
Comment
-
Re: 3M performance finish vs. NXT 2.0
I don't mean to take this a big issue but, but, I think the some of the replies went too far. I can take trust me I work at a machine shop. But, does that make me or anybody else who replies to this post any other one an MBA once I log on ah no.
I've seen this same patten last year when there was talk of GM/Nissan meager on another site. People got upset and scared of could happen to Gm. And before you know it the people saw things in other way got banned from the site.
We are all mostly outsiders looking when post about favorite companies etc. 3M and Megs know what they have plans for in the coming mos. and years ahead. And it's going to work out great.
Besides words and what they mean vary from person to person sometimes they are different than the actual definition.
Acquire:
1: to get as one's own: a: to come into possession or control of often by unspecified means b: to come to have as a new or added characteristic, trait, or ability (as by sustained effort or natural selection)2: to locate and hold (a desired object) in a detector
Purchase: gain, acquire b: to acquire (real estate) by means other than descent c: to obtain by paying money or its equivalent : buy d: to obtain by labor, danger, or sacrifice2: to constitute the means for buyingintransitive verb
Comment
-
Re: 3M performance finish vs. NXT 2.0
Originally posted by saturn2 View PostI don't mean to take this a big issue but, but, I think the some of the replies went too far. I can take trust me I work at a machine shop. But, does that make me or anybody else who replies to this post any other one an MBA once I log on ah no.
I've seen this same patten last year when there was talk of GM/Nissan meager on another site. People got upset and scared of could happen to Gm. And before you know it the people saw things in other way got banned from the site.
We are all mostly outsiders looking when post about favorite companies etc. 3M and Megs know what they have plans for in the coming mos. and years ahead. And it's going to work out great.
Besides words and what they mean vary from person to person sometimes they are different than the actual definition.
Acquire:
1: to get as one's own: a: to come into possession or control of often by unspecified means b: to come to have as a new or added characteristic, trait, or ability (as by sustained effort or natural selection)2: to locate and hold (a desired object) in a detector
Purchase: gain, acquire b: to acquire (real estate) by means other than descent c: to obtain by paying money or its equivalent : buy d: to obtain by labor, danger, or sacrifice2: to constitute the means for buyingintransitive verb I was wondering since 3m has taken over Megs.
Andy
101impalaKeeping MOL family friendly! If you need help or have a question, don't hesitate to shoot me an email or PM. 101impala@gmail.com
Andy M. Moderator
Comment
-
Re: 3M performance finish vs. NXT 2.0
Originally posted by saturn2 View PostYou mean the 3m man isn't going to come and relabel all my stuff lol.
AndyKeeping MOL family friendly! If you need help or have a question, don't hesitate to shoot me an email or PM. 101impala@gmail.com
Andy M. Moderator
Comment
-
Re: 3M performance finish vs. NXT 2.0
i compared the two products.
i have a single stage red metallic paint.
and on my car 2.0 was better.
performance finish removed paint as i laid a coat down, was rather difficult to remove, and didnt feel as glassy as 2.0 which i laid down next to the performance finish. as for durability, i cant go that far, i took 2.0 to the whole car after i was angered with the test spots.
now that was with a single stage aftermarket paint, someone else should comment with a clearcoat paint. maybe totally different.
Comment
-
Re: 3M performance finish vs. NXT 2.0
I used the NXT when it first came out and it was great. A while back I tried the NXT2.0 and hated it. I'm new here so excuse me if I missed something but the new 2.0 version just smears. I had to use #26 to clean the paint up.
Comment
Comment