How often can I safely use DACP on my finish ?
- If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Dacp ?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by manueljlg
I didn“t know it was that safe.
Thank You.
I like to keep my finish in good enough shape so I can use a less abrasive product come detail time.Last edited by rusty bumper; Apr 24, 2004, 05:30 PM.r. b.
Comment
-
#9 and #82 are VERY similar products however, the #82 is slightly more agressive. If you're just looking to do one vehicle, I'd go with the #9 as it'll be slightly cheaper as it's available in a 16oz size whereas #82 is only available in 32oz and 1 gallon.
As Rusty mentioned, I'd start with the least agressive product and move upwards. Further, you can always apply a couple of coats of something that is slightly less agressive to typically achieve an end result similar to a more abrassive product.
Hence, I've applied three layers of #9 (by hand) and got awesome results but, on a very similar finish, I've utilzed a PC and #83 and got the same result in one pass.
RP
Comment
-
Originally posted by manueljlg
#9 or # 82 ?
Which would be better for my ligthly swirled paint ?
I just started using #82 recently and I like it very much...It leaves a deep gloss similar to #7.
But both #9, and #82 are great products.r. b.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rusty Bumper
I just started using #82 recently and I like it very much...It leaves a deep gloss similar to #7.
But both #9, and #82 are great products.
Based on your above statement, would you say there is any need to follow #82 with #7, or skip the #7 and go straight to wax after 82?Username "FLAWLESS" on every other forum, but was taken already on here.
Flawless Auto Detailing - "Expect Perfection"
Comment
-
Originally posted by FLAWLESS-VW
Hey Rusty, I'm going to start using #82 soon, and use #7 as one of my bread and butter products.
Based on your above statement, would you say there is any need to follow #82 with #7, or skip the #7 and go straight to wax after 82?
Myself, I would like to try #81 Hand Polish after #82, as I have heard it makes the paint look even better.
But, to answer your question, I would say skip #7 and go straight to a wax IMO, because #82 is rich in polishing oils anyway.r. b.
Comment
-
Originally posted by FLAWLESS-VW
Hey Rusty, I'm going to start using #82 soon, and use #7 as one of my bread and butter products.
Based on your above statement, would you say there is any need to follow #82 with #7, or skip the #7 and go straight to wax after 82?
Last edited by Spotty-Dog; Apr 25, 2004, 06:28 PM.
Comment
-
For what its worth I have used #9 2.0 and my PC with good results but I can not compare it to #82 since I have never used it. I will give the #9 2.0 a thumbs up.Brandon
2007 Black Chevy Avalanche
My Albums: Avalanche
Meguiars Online Acronyms - Meguiars Product List....
Comment
-
While we're on the topic
How are you guys working the #82? I'd assume not as slowly as DACP? How much product are you using on the PC pad? With DACP I go turltle slow on speed 6, and use about a nickel sized dap on the pad. How does 82 compare?
BTW, GREAT results Spotty-DogUsername "FLAWLESS" on every other forum, but was taken already on here.
Flawless Auto Detailing - "Expect Perfection"
Comment
Comment