Back to Mark's post with the sand paper analogy, here are my questions:
Same concept applies to paint. You start with more aggressive products and work your way back down to fine products that leave the finish smooth and glossy. - Mark
2.) While I was thinking about it, how do these 2 compare in figuring out the aggressiveness?
M80 with Polishing pad V.S. M80 with Light Cutting pad
Will the M80 with Light Cutting Pad cut deeper than with the M80+Polishing Pad?
3.) Please tell me if I'm correct on this: So basically there's 2 DIFFERENT concepts.
The first concept is to use the most aggressive polish, and work your way down to milder polish. This doesn't mean to use M105 right off the bat. What it means is to use the strongest polish that will remove JUST ENOUGH clear coat to get the swirls out (most aggressive polish = just strong enough), and work your way down (milder polishes) to remove the scratches left by the aggressive polish. *In my case, if I were to have VERY LIGHT swirl marks, then maybe M09 is my "most aggressive polish". Also, more aggressive products = leave bigger scratches whereas milder products = leave smaller scratches too small to be seen.
The second concept, which is to start from the mildest polish and work your way up so that you don't remove excessive clear coat at once.
So to combine the 2 concepts, "mildest polish" in the 2nd concept can also mean the "most aggressive polish" from the 1st concept.
I hope you guys really won't mind me asking so many questions as I am very slow at understanding.
Leave a comment: