What's it going to take to get pics in our signatures? I don't see it being an issue as long as the signatures size (picture + text) is limited to 600x400.
Such small pics shouldn't affect browsing, considering just about EVERYONE has broadband now.
Another reason to have pics in sigs is that we get to see what everyone drives and how shiney their cars are. I know everyone here loves their cars and would love to show them off in their sigs if they only had the chance.
Having pics in the sigs would make this site so much more interesting. Just TEXT TEXT TEXT is so dull. Sig pics break up the monotany and make the forum more enjoyable.
Would you other forumers like pictures in your signature?
P.S. I created this post to look like what a post on another forum looks like, reply + signature, exactly as it looks on the other site.
__________________
Such small pics shouldn't affect browsing, considering just about EVERYONE has broadband now.
Another reason to have pics in sigs is that we get to see what everyone drives and how shiney their cars are. I know everyone here loves their cars and would love to show them off in their sigs if they only had the chance.
Having pics in the sigs would make this site so much more interesting. Just TEXT TEXT TEXT is so dull. Sig pics break up the monotany and make the forum more enjoyable.
Would you other forumers like pictures in your signature?
P.S. I created this post to look like what a post on another forum looks like, reply + signature, exactly as it looks on the other site.
__________________

Comment