ScratchX

[blackt00th]

Re: ScratchX

M80 is less aggressive compared to ScratchX 2.0
M80 is more aggressive compared to ScratchX (Some call it ScratchX 1.0 but we never officially gave it that name)

Great. Thanks Mike for the confirmation.

[blackt00th]

Re: ScratchX

Can't wait for UC and SwirlX to land on our shore.
So I ended up with ScratchX and GoldClass over the weekend.

Now I can't wait to start work on it and my step will be as follows:

1. NXT or GoldClass shampoo
2. Clay
3. ScratchX
4. Goldclass x2

[froggyman]

Re: ScratchX

Can't wait for UC and SwirlX to land on our shore.
So I ended up with ScratchX and GoldClass over the weekend.

Now I can't wait to start work on it and my step will be as follows:

1. NXT or GoldClass shampoo
2. Clay
3. ScratchX
4. Goldclass x2

Luckily me .. just got the UC last weekend (through a friend who went to US to visit his family members)... but then have not try it out yet.
didn't think of getting SwirlX at that time...

[blackt00th]

Re: ScratchX

Luckily me .. just got the UC last weekend (through a friend who went to US to visit his family members)... but then have not try it out yet.
didn't think of getting SwirlX at that time...

lucky u... I think the earliest I can get both will be in May.

[froggyman]

Re: ScratchX

lucky u... I think the earliest I can get both will be in May.

Ya...should have got the SwirlX too.
But at least got the UC at cheaper price.
Btw, U try the M82(by hand)?..how it compare to ScratchX?

[Lagos]

Re: ScratchX

I personally was disappointed with the original scratchX. I just felt like it wasn't strong enough, and I never really saw any results with it. Im glad it got reformulated into a stronger product.

[Mike Phillips]

Re: ScratchX

I personally was disappointed with the original scratchX. I just felt like it wasn't strong enough, and I never really saw any results with it. Im glad it got reformulated into a stronger product.

Everybody's glad it now works faster and more effectively by hand thanks to SMAT.

For what it's worth I can't even begin to count how many times I've removed swirls and scratches using the original ScratchX in front of 20 to 50 sets of eyeballs.

The original ScratchX works, but it's very technique driven and requires a little of the correct type of passion behind the pad.

[blackt00th]

Re: ScratchX

Ya...should have got the SwirlX too.
But at least got the UC at cheaper price.
Btw, U try the M82(by hand)?..how it compare to ScratchX?

I did not really did a side by side comparision.
To me, as long as it is from Meg, I know that I will not go wrong.

[blackt00th]

Re: ScratchX

I personally was disappointed with the original scratchX. I just felt like it wasn't strong enough, and I never really saw any results with it. Im glad it got reformulated into a stronger product.

It is more of the expectation on a product and how fast you would expect the product to show results.
But many times, did we question ourselves if we get the technique right?
To be frank, I am still learning and trying to improve on the technique.
At times when the "form" is not right, I will get funny results.