nxt 2.0 wax vs paste

[ali pontiac]

wich is better guys to give the wet look??

[Carfire]

Re: nxt 2.0 wax vs paste

I think they give the same results.
It is more of preference which you like to apply more.
Some people say liquid is easier to apply than paste.

[Ryan L.]

Re: nxt 2.0 wax vs paste

They will both produce the same results.

The main difference is that the liquid can be applied via a machine such as the Dual Action Polisher (G110, DA, PC) or rotary buffer.

Other than that its personal preference.

Ryan

[Slicked]

Re: nxt 2.0 wax vs paste

Liquid is far easier to work with IMO. The paste suits enthousiasts that like a bit of old-world charm from their LSPs.

[Tuck91]

Re: nxt 2.0 wax vs paste

I like liquid because its easier to get a thin coat with and easier to remove

its pretty much personal preference, they are both reallly good

[ali pontiac]

Re: nxt 2.0 wax vs paste

thanx guys

i think the paste i richer and more oily

[3Fitty]

Re: nxt 2.0 wax vs paste

I've never used the NXT 2.0 paste, but I've used other pastes and I think it is just personal preference on application and removal. I despise putting on pastes so I choose the liquid.

[Mike Phillips]

Re: nxt 2.0 wax vs paste

Your end-results are predominantly affected by your prep-work.

Gloss or the wet-look comes from a smooth surface. So focusing your energy and efforts at insuring the surface is as smooth and clean as possible will result in the glossiest finish.

[mb911]

Re: nxt 2.0 wax vs paste

I use liquid, with using DA. If I'm applying second coat next day or something, I use paste by hand. I like working with pastes. They're fun.

[Ganesa]

Re: nxt 2.0 wax vs paste

i have only used the liquid version of nxt 2.0, but have been curious of the paste..
is the paste as easy to buff as the liquid?

[mb911]

Re: nxt 2.0 wax vs paste

i have only used the liquid version of nxt 2.0, but have been curious of the paste..
is the paste as easy to buff as the liquid?

In my opinion, I think so. I think maybe it takes more concentration, to apply a thin coat with a paste. If you apply a thin coat, it's just as easy.

If you put it on a bit thick, you can still take it off pretty easy, but I'm not one who minds having to put a tiny bit of effort.

It's fun working with a paste sometimes, but if you have liquid and happy, I wouldn't worry about trying the paste.

[yanks_178]

Re: nxt 2.0 wax vs paste

Does one bottle of the Meguiar's NXT enought to wax 2 cars? How many vehicles do you get out of the bottle? Is it available to be bought in bulk?

[Markus Kleis]

Re: nxt 2.0 wax vs paste

Does one bottle of the Meguiar's NXT enought to wax 2 cars? How many vehicles do you get out of the bottle? Is it available to be bought in bulk?

A bottle of liquid NXT 2.0 should last the average user for MANY vehicles, and for personal use (few vehicles in the household) likely a couple years.

NXT 2.0 is a very economical wax and it does best when applied in very thin coats, which helps it (the bottle) to last a long time.

To buy it in bulk you would need to buy the professional version which is for all intensive purposes the same product (difference is you can apply with a rotary) and it is called M21 2.0.

[Slicked]

Re: nxt 2.0 wax vs paste

A bottle can last a very long time . Once you master the art of thin coats, a bottle goes a LONG, LONG way for an enthousiast taking care of 2-3 cars.

[Ganesa]

Re: nxt 2.0 wax vs paste

thanks... i think i'll try the nxt 2.0 paste someday.. but for now this liquid nxt 2.0 is just smooth and shiny rocking the surface of my car, just by applying 2 thin coats..