liquid or paste

[mopar]

ok guys does anybody know the defference between paste or liquid?is there even a defference ??

[Mosca]

Well, I think you mean other than the obvious?

My experience is that it's mostly one of economy. If you use paste, you get more applications for the money. If you use liquid, you get fewer applications, but it's easier to use.

I used to be diehard paste user, but I'm coming around to the liquid camp, slowly.


Tom

[Rockpick]

Outside of the physical characteristics, they are the same products.

The liquid is going to contain 'something else' (be it water or another type of chemical) to serve as the 'delivery agent' for the actual wax.

Paste wax will utilize a more solid 'delivery agent' to get the wax on your vehicle.

Either way, you should come out with results that rival eachother with no difference in protection and such.

Mosca does bring a valid point to the table about useage and total applications...

RP

[TOGWT]

Quote: liquid or paste

~One man’s opinion /observations~

If memory serves Liquid wax was marketed for machine application (and your right it contains more solvent (spread ability) and oil (lubrication)

Concourse Tip: To achieve the ultimate depth of colour, the most spectacular wet-look shine, and maximize longevity of waxed surface - apply a liquid wax over an application of a paste wax, final buff after 2-4 hours, awesome results


~Hope this helps~

Experience unshared; is knowledge wasted…/

justadumbarchitect * so i question everything*

[Boss_429]

I guess I'm still "old fashioned"................... and still prefer the paste to liquid waxes. I've always felt that the paste waxes give a better "fill" of the paint surface. To me, the paste waxes also feel more "substantial" when applying them. Probably more mental than anything else?

[Andy Choi]

no difference

No difference....
Only paste and liquid... I think.

But liquid is easyer. easyer means.. easy on, easy off so....
I can feel better than paste.

If I use paste, dirty remains on my hands.

I prefer liquid. also it takes small space in my bag....

[txz28]

Does anyone know how the durability of paste vs liquid compares? I know that TOGWT states that liquid over paste gives the longest lasting, but why?

[TOGWT]

Quote: Does anyone know how the durability of paste vs liquid compares? I know that TOGWT states that liquid over paste gives the longest lasting, but why?


~One mans opinion / observation~



Quote: Does anyone know how the durability of paste vs liquid compares? I know that TOGWT states that liquid over paste gives the longest lasting, but why?


~One mans opinion / observation~

They both use Carnauba wax, as a base so there is no difference in durability. My suggestion on applying a liquid over a paste wax was for max shine / wet-look. ‘Layering’ in my opinion all you are doing is increasing the density but it’s not the same as a ‘film build’ in paint.

PS: I apologise for the ‘durability’ statement, that was what my fingers typed, but not what my brain knows.

~Hope this helps~


Experience unshared; is knowledge wasted…/

justadumbarchitect * so i question everything*


~Hope this helps~


Experience unshared; is knowledge wasted…/

justadumbarchitect * so i question everything*

[Mike Phillips]

Hi mopar,

The difference between paste and liquid wax is primarily one of convenience and personal preference. Meguiar’s liquid formulas provide the same protection as paste, and are easier and faster to apply.

That said, there is something about spending a Saturday afternoon, leisurely applying a traditional paste wax to your pride and joy that people find both enjoyable and rewarding.

Mike

[Slats]

I agree with Mike, but here are my thoughts on liquid vs. paste. Both are easy to apply, but with paste if the applicator becomes dirty then you could be rubbing the dirt into the paste. With liquid, if you accidentely get the pad dirty (maybe you missed a spot washing or claying) then it's no big deal -- get a clean applicator and no worries about the liquid wax being contaminated since it has no direct contact with the applicator. Just my thoughts....

Slats

P.S. Looking forward to trying some GC wax after I use my other wax up!

[foris2]

Slats - I like your analogy.

[Mike Phillips]

Originally posted by Slats
but with paste if the applicator becomes dirty then you could be rubbing the dirt into the paste.

With liquid, if you accidentally get the pad dirty (maybe you missed a spot washing or claying) then it's no big deal -- get a clean applicator and no worries about the liquid wax being contaminated since it has no direct contact with the applicator. Just my thoughts....

Slats

These are some very good points. I often write about the potential of something to happen, such as the potential to instill scratches, etc.

You make a good point when you say with a paste wax, because you continually re-introduce your wax pad into the wax container, the potential is there to deposit a contaminant. Then, if you don't see it and thus remove it, you could potentially pick it up into/onto your applicator pad and potentially instill a scratch or scratches into your vehicles' finish.

With a liquid, because you never introduce your applicator to the liquid in the bottle, (you only pour out more liquid onto the pad), the potential to contaminate the liquid wax does not exist.

Keen observation for those who consider polishing paint an art form and take serious the conscience act of always, reducing the potential to instill a scratch.

You are indeed wise Grasshopper...

That said,

For years I used the #16 Professional Paste Wax on all of the cars I buffed out for it's excellent gloss characteristics. I was aware of the potential for re-introducing contaminants into the wax because it happened from time to tome. For this reason, I made it a habit to continuously inspect the wax in the can for contaminants as well as turning my wax pad over and inspecting the surface for dirt, abrasive particles, and contaminants of any kind. Upon finding any such contaminants, I would gingerly pick them either out of the can, or off the surface of my foam applicator pad, usually using my finger nail.

Because all of the cars I applied the #16 Professional Paste Wax to had previously been meticulously washed and the taped-off like a painter would tape-off a car before painting, and then thoroughly machine cleaned, and then machine polished, (with a rotary buffer), I seldom experienced contaminants in my paste wax, or on my applicator.

You do however bring up a valid concern and one that should not be waxed over without regard. (No pun intended)

If you use a paste wax, inspect your wax and your wax pad often as an inexpensive insurance policy against accidentally re-introducing abrasive particles, dirt, or other contaminants onto your finish.

Mike

[Mike Phillips]

Originally posted by TOGWT
Quote: liquid or paste

~One man’s opinion /observations~

If memory serves Liquid wax was marketed for machine application (and your right it contains more solvent (spread ability) and oil (lubrication)

While it may be true that some companies liquid waxes contain solvent, or more solvent than found in their paste waxes, this does not hold true for Meguiar's waxes.