• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

PC + 105 + cutting pad 2.0 review

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • PC + 105 + cutting pad 2.0 review

    Well I finally got around to compounding my GF's new car today. Compound a new car you ask!?! Well yes! It's a 2008 Subaru Impreza. We bought it 4 months ago with 11k miles....as the sun was going down...stupid! We owned the car for less than 12 hours when I had it in the garage to buff it out. I noticed lots of buffer induced swirls and halos. It also had the deepest wash brush marks I have ever seen. It also was COVERED in white overspray. It's a charcoal metallic so the tiny over spray spots where not easily noticed even in direct sunlight. I was time limited and knew that I had hours of work ahead of me to remove the over spray. So instead I just gave it a quick clay with blue mild to make the surface smooth and followed that with 83/rotary/7006 and 80/DA/8006. Topped it with some 21 and called it a day.

    Fast forward to last week and I finally have time to remove the over spray. It took about 6 hours with red aggressive to remove all of it. Looking over the results of my last buff session on it I knew I was going to need something a lot stronger than 83 to get the job done. I did test spots with SOLO on various pads first and then moved on to 105. 105 at 1000rpms/7006pad did the trick in one pass. That followed with 80/8006/DA left a finish free of any swirls, halo's, or the earlier mentioned wash scratches.

    Just for fun I did some test spots with 105 and a few different pads on my DA. Here is what I found:

    DA/8006 pad/105/speed 5
    This did a fair amount of defect removal and left a nice, yet slightly hazy finish that cleaned up with 80/8006/DA. Work time was similar to what I see with 83. This would be a great first step for somebody not quite comfortable with a rotary yet but still needs more cut than 83/8006/DA. I only tried it on this paint though, so YMMV and proceed with caution as this is not an approved method of use by Meguiar's.

    DA/Cutting pad 2.0/105/Speed 5
    This combo proved too aggressive for the DA. With moderate pressure the machine would bog so I had to use light pressure. The finish left was more hazy than with the polishing pad and less correction was done. I assume this is due to the light pressure dragging the abrasives over the paint rather than being worked into the paint and having a chance to cut. Feel free to correct me though as it's just a guess. Again, this was on one particular paint. It may work better on others and I wouldn't be scared to try it again. #80/8006/DA was NOT able to remove the haze in one pass. So I tried 83 on a 2.0 cutting pad at speed 5 and that did the trick. The wash scratches where however deeper than on the section that just had 105/8006/DA. So it wouldn't be worth the extra step IMO. Maybe a G110 with it's more powerful motor might do a better job with this combo? Maybe I should pony up and buy one to see!

    DA/Cutting pad 2.0/83/DA
    Not much to say here. The cutting pad worked great and left no haze. No where near the correction of 105 on an 8006 pad though. I'm sure this combo has it's place somewhere on some paint in some detail though! I won't hesitate to try it again in the future.

    I know some pics would be nice but I didn't take any sorry!
    I will post up some pics of the full detail though in the coming days.

    Questions? Comments?
    Jason

  • #2
    Re: PC + 105 + cutting pad 2.0 review

    Thanks to capitalizing on the scenario to give us some info! Much appreciated!

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: PC + 105 + cutting pad 2.0 review

      Thanks for sharing!
      SYDSTER

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: PC + 105 + cutting pad 2.0 review

        Good info. thanks for sharing.
        quality creates its own demand

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: PC + 105 + cutting pad 2.0 review

          Thanks for sharing your results. I'm always curious to see what results people are getting with M105 via a PC.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: PC + 105 + cutting pad 2.0 review

            great info, thanks for the post.
            Navy Blue Metallic Pearl 2002 Camaro Z28: Build in progress. (416" LS3/9" Rear End/TH400/200 Shot)
            Superior Blue Metallic 2005 Trailblazer LS: !Badges/!Molding/20% Tint/Stealth Audio in Progress

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: PC + 105 + cutting pad 2.0 review

              No problem. I'm glad you all enjoyed it and found it useful! I'm working on one for the new black finishing pad right now actually. It's got some after pics so be sure to check it out.
              Jason

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: PC + 105 + cutting pad 2.0 review

                Just got done using 105 on my vehicle. Looks like I'll be replacing 83 with 105. 105 -> 80 -> wax!

                I used 8006 pad at 5-6 speeds depending.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: PC + 105 + cutting pad 2.0 review

                  I have used something similar yesturday via PC not quite as agressive as got the product before #105 was out. This is a really bad swirl'd up wing on a car, i used a Sonus SFX cutting pad with 2 dabs of #83 and one of 3M Fast Cut Plus. Came out alright, as it did on the bonnet which was pretty much soley 3M FCP (bit of #83 keeps the dusting down),

                  Could the subaru paint be too soft for the #105, japanese cas tend to be softer dont they





                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: PC + 105 + cutting pad 2.0 review

                    Nice review! I am also going to try the M105 with a G100 in the near future. Glad to see it worked out for you. Thanks for taking the time to write out your results.

                    Andy
                    Keeping MOL family friendly! If you need help or have a question, don't hesitate to shoot me an email or PM. 101impala@gmail.com
                    Andy M. Moderator

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: PC + 105 + cutting pad 2.0 review

                      I've had great success using #105 w/ the G110 + 8006 pad. I have some 2.0 cutting pads coming in the mail today, can't wait to give them a try!
                      1999 Ford Contour SVT
                      Silver Frost/Midnite Blue
                      1966/2760

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: PC + 105 + cutting pad 2.0 review

                        Originally posted by VonLego View Post
                        Just got done using 105 on my vehicle. Looks like I'll be replacing 83 with 105. 105 -> 80 -> wax!

                        I used 8006 pad at 5-6 speeds depending.
                        I wouldn't replace 83 with 105. More like supplement 83 with 105. I still start with 83 first if I can. If it doesn't cut it then I move to 105. It's really nice to have both. On some paints I have had to go 105, 83, 80. Some paints might need that middle step and you'll be kicking yourself if you don't have it.
                        Jason

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: PC + 105 + cutting pad 2.0 review

                          Originally posted by christian6984 View Post
                          Could the subaru paint be too soft for the #105, japanese cas tend to be softer dont they
                          No way of knowing until you get out there and work on the paint how hard it will be. Our 08 Subaru is what I would consider medium hardness. And I have had great luck with 105 on soft paint. So even if it is soft it won't be too soft for 105 most likely. 105 tend to finish out very well on soft paint. You may just need to add in another step of polishing before you go to our finish polish if it's way soft.
                          Jason

                          Comment

                          Your Privacy Choices
                          Working...
                          X