• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

D160 versus D162

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • #1

    D160 versus D162

    Can anyone shed any light on the comparative superiority of either one of these two dressings? Since they will both ship to Florida, and I don't plan on using either as cologne or pouring either down the sewer, I'm not concerned about the "Green" aspect.

    My main interest is in overall product performance, gloss level, longevity, ease of use, ease of removal and obtaining a pleasant uniform appearance, etc.

    I suspect my main intent will most likely be to use the dressing for tires, assorted lower body moldings and maybe wheel wells.

    Thanks as always!

    Meguiar's D160 All Season Dressing



    1-Gal Meguiar's D162 Solvent Based Dressing
    "If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research would it? (Albert Einstein 1879-1955)
    BOB
    Tags: None
  • #2
    Re: D160 versus D162

    Go with the All Season Dressing, I have gone through gallons of the stuff. It will work great on exterior trim and tires. Its not really for interiors.

    I havent tried SBD so I cannot comment on that.
    Nick
    Tucker's Detailing Services
    815-954-0773
    2012 Ford Transit Connect

    Comment

    • #3
      Re: D160 versus D162

      I believe D162 flashes a bit quicker and has more longevity than D160. The downside to D162 are most states cannot get it due to VOC laws, plus its never in stock at ADS in the gallon size.
      NOTE: Post count does not reflect actual detailing knowledge.

      Comment

      • #4
        Re: D160 versus D162

        Originally posted by ColonelCash View Post
        I believe D162 flashes a bit quicker and has more longevity than D160. The downside to D162 are most states cannot get it due to VOC laws, plus its never in stock at ADS in the gallon size.
        Not only an accurate observation/statement, but both issues are closely related.

        It's the VOC compliant formula in D160 that not only makes it widely available but also causes it to not last quite as long as D162 - but that lifespan is a pretty fine distinction between the two. The observation that D162 "flashes a bit quicker" is also due to the VOC content that no longer falls within regulatory constraints of most areas.

        So how to choose? Availability and price, really.
        Michael Stoops
        Senior Global Product & Training Specialist | Meguiar's Inc.

        Remember, this hobby is supposed to be your therapy, not the reason you need therapy.

        Comment

        • #5
          Re: D160 versus D162

          Originally posted by Michael Stoops View Post
          Not only an accurate observation/statement, but both issues are closely related.

          It's the VOC compliant formula in D160 that not only makes it widely available but also causes it to not last quite as long as D162 - but that lifespan is a pretty fine distinction between the two. The observation that D162 "flashes a bit quicker" is also due to the VOC content that no longer falls within regulatory constraints of most areas.

          So how to choose? Availability and price, really.
          Thanks Mike!!!
          "If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research would it? (Albert Einstein 1879-1955)
          BOB

          Comment

          Previous template Next
          Your Privacy Choices
          Working...
          X