• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Correct method of Scratch X 2.0 application?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Correct method of Scratch X 2.0 application?

    previously I detailed my fathers car, I started with an application of Scratch X 2.0 by hand with a soft foam applicator pad and finished with polish and wax, when I pulled the car out in the sun I noticed the product did a great job at removing swirls and scratches

    .. I was pretty shocked actually at the result, especially as it was used by hand, but I could see some very small marring/hazing marks, then I realised that the problem may have been in my application - I used straight line motions with a relativley large amount of pressure


    am I correct in saying that scratch x 2 requires a lot less pressure in its application as it utilizes SMAT when compared to the older scratch x, and the use of circular motion is generally better??

  • #2
    Re: Correct method of Scratch X 2.0 application?

    The marring could be normal if you used too much pressure. Keep in mind that ScratchX 2.0 is a relatively aggressive product in Meguiar's line of Consumer products, second only to the Ultimate Compound. Because of the technological nature of ScratchX 2.0 that I will not go into details here, start with light pressure to see if it is removing the defect. If not, gradually increase pressure until desired result is achieved. You are correct that the advancement of SMAT requires less pressure to be exerted for lighter defects. When dealing with deeper scratches or more severe defects, you can adjust pressure accordingly to increase the effectiveness of the product.

    The use of circular motion is preferred for even coverage, but not necessary. For example, in tight areas such as door handles, it's almost impossible to effectively engage in circular motions. Result is not compromised by utilizing straight line motions in most cases.

    Comment

    Your Privacy Choices
    Working...
    X