• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ScratchX

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • blackt00th
    replied
    Re: ScratchX

    Originally posted by Lagos View Post
    I personally was disappointed with the original scratchX. I just felt like it wasn't strong enough, and I never really saw any results with it. Im glad it got reformulated into a stronger product.

    It is more of the expectation on a product and how fast you would expect the product to show results.
    But many times, did we question ourselves if we get the technique right?
    To be frank, I am still learning and trying to improve on the technique.
    At times when the "form" is not right, I will get funny results.

    Leave a comment:


  • blackt00th
    replied
    Re: ScratchX

    Originally posted by froggyman View Post
    Ya...should have got the SwirlX too.
    But at least got the UC at cheaper price.
    Btw, U try the M82(by hand)?..how it compare to ScratchX?
    I did not really did a side by side comparision.
    To me, as long as it is from Meg, I know that I will not go wrong.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mike Phillips
    replied
    Re: ScratchX

    Originally posted by Lagos View Post
    I personally was disappointed with the original scratchX. I just felt like it wasn't strong enough, and I never really saw any results with it. Im glad it got reformulated into a stronger product.
    Everybody's glad it now works faster and more effectively by hand thanks to SMAT.

    For what it's worth I can't even begin to count how many times I've removed swirls and scratches using the original ScratchX in front of 20 to 50 sets of eyeballs.

    The original ScratchX works, but it's very technique driven and requires a little of the correct type of passion behind the pad.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lagos
    replied
    Re: ScratchX

    I personally was disappointed with the original scratchX. I just felt like it wasn't strong enough, and I never really saw any results with it. Im glad it got reformulated into a stronger product.

    Leave a comment:


  • froggyman
    replied
    Re: ScratchX

    Originally posted by blackt00th View Post
    lucky u... I think the earliest I can get both will be in May.
    Ya...should have got the SwirlX too.
    But at least got the UC at cheaper price.
    Btw, U try the M82(by hand)?..how it compare to ScratchX?

    Leave a comment:


  • blackt00th
    replied
    Re: ScratchX

    Originally posted by froggyman View Post
    Luckily me .. just got the UC last weekend (through a friend who went to US to visit his family members)... but then have not try it out yet.
    didn't think of getting SwirlX at that time...
    lucky u... I think the earliest I can get both will be in May.

    Leave a comment:


  • froggyman
    replied
    Re: ScratchX

    Originally posted by blackt00th View Post
    Can't wait for UC and SwirlX to land on our shore.
    So I ended up with ScratchX and GoldClass over the weekend.

    Now I can't wait to start work on it and my step will be as follows:

    1. NXT or GoldClass shampoo
    2. Clay
    3. ScratchX
    4. Goldclass x2

    Luckily me .. just got the UC last weekend (through a friend who went to US to visit his family members)... but then have not try it out yet.
    didn't think of getting SwirlX at that time...

    Leave a comment:


  • blackt00th
    replied
    Re: ScratchX

    Can't wait for UC and SwirlX to land on our shore.
    So I ended up with ScratchX and GoldClass over the weekend.

    Now I can't wait to start work on it and my step will be as follows:

    1. NXT or GoldClass shampoo
    2. Clay
    3. ScratchX
    4. Goldclass x2

    Leave a comment:


  • blackt00th
    replied
    Re: ScratchX

    Originally posted by Mike Phillips View Post
    M80 is less aggressive compared to ScratchX 2.0
    M80 is more aggressive compared to ScratchX (Some call it ScratchX 1.0 but we never officially gave it that name)


    Great. Thanks Mike for the confirmation.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mike Phillips
    replied
    Re: ScratchX

    Originally posted by blackt00th View Post
    I thought #80 is slight more aggressive than ScratchX?
    M80 is less aggressive compared to ScratchX 2.0
    M80 is more aggressive compared to ScratchX (Some call it ScratchX 1.0 but we never officially gave it that name)


    Leave a comment:


  • blackt00th
    replied
    Re: ScratchX

    Originally posted by Tuck91 View Post
    instead of stocking up on Scratch X, see if you can get your hands on #80, its even a little less aggressive than Scratch X and can be used by hand
    I thought #80 is slight more agressive than ScratchX?

    Leave a comment:


  • blackt00th
    replied
    Re: ScratchX

    Originally posted by Megafast13 View Post
    There are several pro line products available, but since you can't get DC1 you probably can't get those either.

    ScratchX is a Paint Cleaner and is actually pretty weak compared to the new line up.

    You can stock up on it and use it as a cleaner
    Yup. My ideal is to stock it up and use it as a paint cleaner so that,periodically, I can strip off the previous application.

    For pro line, only 1 gallon size is available here. Althought I am very tempted to get #83 and work it by hand or my wolly obital.

    Leave a comment:


  • blackt00th
    replied
    Re: ScratchX

    Originally posted by Mike Phillips View Post
    If you like ScratchX in the current formula stock up on a few tubes, no problems there.

    You can apply it with passion or for very light cleaning apply it lightly.


    Another great option for a light cleaner/polish would be either M09 or M82 in our professional Line. Both products are light cleaner/polishes and for light cleaning and polishing before applying a wax apply either of these gently and then wipe off the residue and move onto wax.

    Yup. I would say I like the current ScratchX as it leave an almost nice finish for me to proceed with LSP. Although a DC2 after ScratchX would be ideal.

    I do have #82 but in 100ml. Over here the professional series are sold only in 1gallon.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mikejl
    replied
    Re: ScratchX

    Copied from a Mike Phillips' Post:

    Most aggressive to least aggressive -->




    Mike

    Leave a comment:


  • Tuck91
    replied
    Re: ScratchX

    instead of stocking up on Scratch X, see if you can get your hands on #80, its even a little less aggressive than Scratch X and can be used by hand

    Leave a comment:

Your Privacy Choices
Working...
X