Over the years that I've been a member here, I've learned a lot.
There are some things I haven't quite understood though, especially after having a few discussions with another detailing friend of mine.
I seem to remember reading to never use a G100 above setting 5. After having some difficulty removing some defects with the G100, I spoke to a friend of mine who does amazing work, exclusively with the G100. He simply said "I only use setting 6 when removing defects" Interesting.
I also have always read "At this time we don't recommend using our cutting pads with a DA Polisher because the foam formula is aggressive enough that it may remove the defects quickly but it can also leave the paint hazy." That's in regards to the 7006. I had to resort to near unconventional means, and I ended up using #83 with a W7006 pad attached to a G100 on setting 6. That actually removed a lot of defects. As I expected, I needed another step (#66 on W8006 on setting 6), and it got rid of any haze and some other smaller defects that were either instilled by the previous combo or that it just didn't pick up before.
Either way, this detail ended up coming out spectacular.
I'm not saying the information on here is wrong, but maybe I'm thinking that the G100 isn't touted as the mean machine that it has the potential to be? Maybe I'm way off base.
Anyone shed some light?
There are some things I haven't quite understood though, especially after having a few discussions with another detailing friend of mine.
I seem to remember reading to never use a G100 above setting 5. After having some difficulty removing some defects with the G100, I spoke to a friend of mine who does amazing work, exclusively with the G100. He simply said "I only use setting 6 when removing defects" Interesting.
I also have always read "At this time we don't recommend using our cutting pads with a DA Polisher because the foam formula is aggressive enough that it may remove the defects quickly but it can also leave the paint hazy." That's in regards to the 7006. I had to resort to near unconventional means, and I ended up using #83 with a W7006 pad attached to a G100 on setting 6. That actually removed a lot of defects. As I expected, I needed another step (#66 on W8006 on setting 6), and it got rid of any haze and some other smaller defects that were either instilled by the previous combo or that it just didn't pick up before.
Either way, this detail ended up coming out spectacular.
I'm not saying the information on here is wrong, but maybe I'm thinking that the G100 isn't touted as the mean machine that it has the potential to be? Maybe I'm way off base.
Anyone shed some light?
Comment