• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Removing VS. Hiding

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Removing VS. Hiding

    I wanted to see what kind of polishes you guys use (compound, polish, finshing polish/glaze) and if they have any fillers in them. All the shops around me use polishes that are loaded with fillers and I am torn between whether to reorder my Menzerna polishes or go to something else that may cover up some swirls. This is not what I want to do, but it seems like customers like this. Do you think my final polish should have fillers in it?

    Thanks,
    Shaun
    Superior Detailing - For All Your Auto Reconditioning Needs.
    Metro Detroit

  • #2
    How would you define the word filler?
    Mike Phillips
    760-515-0444
    showcargarage@gmail.com

    "Find something you like and use it often"

    Comment


    • #3
      I think he means waxes that fill/hide minor swirls like NXT for example. If I polished my car everytime it swirled I would have no paint left, how do I know this, I did it, polished a black Suburban down to primer after buffing it monthly for 6 years. Since then I learned that a wax that has the ability to hide swirls is much better than over polishing and trying to remove swirls every time. For a long time I used Klasse AIO which has good swirl filling ability but it's a pain to put on/off as you have to apply it with a moist towel and then buff off before it dries (tough to do in summer) so I switched to NXT Tech Wax as I can do the entire car, let it dry and then wipe it off.

      For times when you need to remove defects like swirls, what I use depends on the severity of the defects and hardness of the paint. Most of the time I use Meg's #83 polish with a PC buffer. If that doesn't do it I have other polishes I use with my rotary buffer. I wouldn't use a compound on a clear coated car, too risky, I would prefer to buff at a higher speed or use a harder pad or do multiple passes with a less aggresive product.

      Comment


      • #4
        Maybe he means something that makes swirl marks less visible.

        For a daily driver, you almost have to have a product that fills (hides) swirls. Most of us don't have the time to polish out swirls every time they appear, and they will appear. And for car owners that use pro-detailers, maybe they can't afford to have frequent full (with swirl removal) details.

        So I agree with the use of swirl filling (hiding) products. When they get too bad for such a product to work, then it is time for the G100 and a cleaner/polish.

        RamAirV1
        2015 Dodge Charger R/T Scat Pack 392Granite Crystal
        2006 GTO Impulse Blue

        Comment


        • #5
          Yeah, if you're doing cars for people who continue to get marring, I'd use something with a little concealing ability. Otherwise you'll eventually have to start using a paint thickness gauge and telling customers that you've taken off all the clear you (safely) can. And at that point you'll *have* to use something that hides anyhow.

          I'd try using something like #80 on a few cars and see how you feel about it. Maybe top it with a LSP like NXT and you could even consider putting a "pure polish"/glaze step in between the two.

          Don't worry, it's not "cheating" if the customers are happy and you're saving their paint
          Practical Perfectionist

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Accumulator
            Yeah, if you're doing cars for people who continue to get marring, I'd use something with a little concealing ability. Otherwise you'll eventually have to start using a paint thickness gauge and telling customers that you've taken off all the clear you (safely) can. And at that point you'll *have* to use something that hides anyhow.

            I'd try using something like #80 on a few cars and see how you feel about it. Maybe top it with a LSP like NXT and you could even consider putting a "pure polish"/glaze step in between the two.

            Don't worry, it's not "cheating" if the customers are happy and you're saving their paint
            A "filler" would be part of a maintenance program anyway.



            RamAirV1
            2015 Dodge Charger R/T Scat Pack 392Granite Crystal
            2006 GTO Impulse Blue

            Comment


            • #7
              So what is the best filler to use then? I know what you all mean by polishing the mess out of a daily driver, its just not worth it. A mild polish and good wax from time to time, but not 83 or stronger maany times a year to keep it "swirl free".

              If you live in a dusty place, its even more of a problem.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by TexDetailer
                So what is the best filler to use then? I know what you all mean by polishing the mess out of a daily driver, its just not worth it. A mild polish and good wax from time to time, but not 83 or stronger maany times a year to keep it "swirl free".

                If you live in a dusty place, its even more of a problem.
                Something like a mild to moderate cleaner/polish.

                Such as, #80, #82, #9, or even a cleaner wax.....Then topped with NXT or some other good LSP.
                Last edited by rusty bumper; Aug 23, 2005, 08:36 PM.
                r. b.

                Comment


                • #9
                  80 and NXT doesn't really fill scratches in, does it? That's a combo I already use. Thought something more thick was being used.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by TexDetailer
                    80 and NXT doesn't really fill scratches in, does it? That's a combo I already use. Thought something more thick was being used.
                    These two items should have some hiding ability, but you could try a pure polish like #7, #81, DC #2, and #5 just to name a few.

                    Edit: On second thought, if #80 and NXT are not hiding enough swirls, then you need to use a DA and something stronger (Like #83) to get those swirls out with.
                    Last edited by rusty bumper; Aug 23, 2005, 09:12 PM.
                    r. b.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      As always in this industry when a question like this is posed it is difficult to answer because there are no standard terms to define what we are all meaning.

                      Let me give you "Bud Abraham's Definition of Detail Terms" to help us communicate clearly:

                      COMPOUND

                      A product formulated to correct a paint finish problem such as scratching, oxidation, dulling, etc. They contain or waxes or silicones.

                      POLISH

                      A product formulated to create a high shine and smooth the paint. It is used as a first step if there are no paint finish problems to enhance the paint finish before applying a protection product. These products typically contain silicones and maybe waxes.

                      SWIRL REMOVER

                      These products are designed to be used AFTER the compound to remove buffing swirls. When I say swirls I mean swirls, not scratches that are in the form of swirls. Often times detailers use too aggressive a compound and/or too aggressive a buffing pad when correcting a paint finish problem and create as many problems as they correct. We are talking about the light micro scratches that occur when using a cutting pad and compound.

                      They also will polish too, that is why we sell a product that both removes swirls and polishes, either way.

                      In this catagory there are swirl removers/eliminators that have sufficient abrasive in them to remove swirls, not fill them.

                      There are also swirl removers which are simply fillers, and when the car is washed a few times and the wax and swirl filler wears away you see the swirls again.

                      Either product would be more effective if the detailer made the right diagnosis on the paint in the first place and did not use too aggressive a compound nor too aggressive a pad.

                      WAXES OR PAINT SEALANTS

                      These are protection products to be applied to the paint for protecting the finish and adding to the shine.

                      Waxes are either carnuaba or synthetic carnuaba (micro-crystaline), the latter being more durable than natural carnuaba. There are also other types of waxes used in wax but for the most part these are the two main ingredients. Depending on cost, determines how good a wax is. The more expensive ingredients used, the more expensive the wax. They also contain silicone fluids. They are available in a paste, creme or liquid. One is not better than the other, it is just an adjust of ingredients that creates the state. They last from 2 weeks to 45 days under the best driving conditions.

                      Paint Sealants, are nothing more than an evolution of protection technology, that is wax technology. They can be formulated in a number of different ways, but the key is that they contain amino functional silicones which makes them different than a wax. Some contain wax. They last longer than a wax 3 to 6 months under the best driving conditions. They should not cost more than $23 a gallon. Never pay $45 a quart.

                      GLAZES

                      A word that is bantied around the industry to mean compound, swirl remover, polish, wax, paint sealant. Really confusing.

                      For clarity I define Glazes as a "body-shop safe" swirl remover or polish. Body shop safe because a glaze does not contain any waxes or silicones in the formulation because you cannot seal a new paint finish for 60 to 90 days after painting to allow all solvents to evaporate.

                      So, with these definitions I would ask the original poster to ask his questions again.

                      Regards
                      Bud Abraham
                      DETAIL PLUS SYSTEMS

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by buda
                        As always in this industry when a question like this is posed it is difficult to answer because there are no standard terms to define what we are all meaning.
                        This is a problem. There is no legal controlling authority over the words and terms used in the car care products industry; everyone is free to use whatever word they like and define it as they see fit.

                        This confuses everyone especially Newbies entering into detailing as either a hobby or a business.
                        Mike Phillips
                        760-515-0444
                        showcargarage@gmail.com

                        "Find something you like and use it often"

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Buellwinkle
                          ...If I polished my car everytime it swirled I would have no paint left, how do I know this, I did it, polished a black Suburban down to primer after buffing it monthly for 6 years...
                          What product, applicator and application method were you using?


                          PC.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Only way to objectively know to some degree the amount of film left on the car, in this case, clear-coat is to use a digital paint thickness guage, and know how to use it to measure the clear coat film.

                            These cost about $400 to $500 and are worth it if you can use it.

                            Regards
                            Bud Abraham
                            DETAIL PLUS SYSTEMS

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Mike:

                              I agree, but all of us in the industry need to help detailers with some type of consistent defintions.

                              If the chemical manufacturers will not or cannot come up with consistent definitions for products then I would seriously suggest that detailers at least consider the definition of catagories as I have suggested so that they can understand what products they are looking for.

                              Bud Abraham
                              DETAIL PLUS SYSTEMS

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X
                              gtag('config', 'UA-161993-8');