is 105 more aggressive than d300? I am using the d300/301 and I think I need something more aggressive than 300 on my very hard CC.
- If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
m105/d300
Collapse
X
-
Re: m105/d300
Originally posted by maxpower View Postis 105 more aggressive than d300? I am using the d300/301 and I think I need something more aggressive than 300 on my very hard CC.
TL
Comment
-
Re: m105/d300
Originally posted by TLMitchell View PostM105 is indeed more aggressive than D300. I've used D300 with great results on hard Corvette and ceramic clearcoats, lots of pressure and long work time. On occasion I run into something stubborn that would take multiple passes of D300 instead of the usual 4 small dots of D300 I went with two dots of D300 and two dots of M105 on the MF cutting pad. Best of both worlds... increased cut of M105, ease of use and clean wipeoff of D300 as well as the good finishing charactoristics of both with less dusting than 105 alone. YMMV.
TL
Comment
-
I actually find m105 works best with the microfiber disks. It cuts great and does not dust nearly as much as the foam pads. Allows for working in the sun which is usually unheard of with m105.Tedrow's Detailing
845-642-1698
Treat Yourself to that New Car Feeling
Comment
Comment